An - Najah Univ. The sample consisted of male and female students from four sections of an undergraduate writing course. A item questionnaire was distributed and the items were structured according to three dimensions:
Share5 Shares Science is held in unique esteem in our society. When we see that an article cites an academic journal, we step back and applaud that finally, somebody is giving us the facts.
We should be able to trust that these studies and papers were created by people dedicated to the pursuit of the truth. But there are a few dirty secrets behind the studies we like to trumpet as the truth.
Because the reality is that the academic journals that publish these studies are running rampant with bad science—and there are a few things in place that allow it to continue happening.
They are treated like the holy grail of sources. Whatever is written in an journals on academic writing process journal is usually accepted as an absolute truth because the papers within them are written by professors and diligently reviewed by highly respected colleagues. Well, some of them are anyway.
And people do it. The number of these fake journals has been on the rise since the Internet began. In fact, from tothe list of fake journals ballooned from 20 to 4, These journals look like peer-reviewed journals.
Ideas printed in these things will get reprinted in the popular media just as easily as ideas in prestigious journals. A pair of computer scientists, frustrated with unwanted spam from a pay-for-publication journal, submitted a joke article.
It was 10 pages of the same seven words repeated over and over: The thing is, nobody ever looked at it. One journalist put this to the test by conducting an absolutely terrible experiment.
He wanted to see what would happen if he gave newspapers weak proof that eating chocolate makes you lose weight—something that should be obviously untrue.
He gathered together 15 people, gave chocolate to five of them, and measured their health in as many categories as he could. He believed that if he tested a small enough group of people on enough different things, the people eating chocolate would have to become healthier in at least one way just by sheer random chance.
Sure enough, his results let him say that chocolate was a weight loss tool.
He paid to have his terrible science put into a journal and then sent his conclusions to newspapers. The response was incredible. His faked findings were reprinted or reported on by Cosmopolitan, The Huffington Post, news networks, and morning talk shows.
And not a single person talking about them mentioned his deliberately bad methodology. Academic journals have been caught reprinting lies that are just as obvious. The British Medical Journal puts out a joke issue each Christmas.
They fill their pages with studies that make ridiculous claims, expecting their readers to appreciate a little levity as a break from the usual fare. Except that not everybody gets the joke. Like their report that analyzed the effect of retroactive prayer. They tried praying for people who were sick 10 years ago and then checked whether or not they got better.
If they got better, they chalked up the recovery to the people in the future praying for them. It was a ridiculous premise. But a few years later, their joke findings were cited as supporting evidence in an article published in a peer-reviewed journal.We are pleased to announce winners of the third Bad Writing Contest, sponsored by the scholarly journal Philosophy and Literature and its internet discussion group, PHIL-LIT..
The Bad Writing Contest attempts to locate the ugliest, most stylistically awful passage found in a scholarly book or article published in the last few years. The Online Writing Lab (OWL) at Purdue University houses writing resources and instructional material, and we provide these as a free service of the Writing Lab at Purdue.
The writing process is simple in theory, but for some the application is a challenge. Atiya on March 16, pm I’m looking for help to begin writing a short story that geals with Wiccan topics.
if anyone can give me names of websites that can be helpful i would really apprecuate it. The peer review process is one of the cornerstones of academic writing, and is a way of ensuring that the information in any academic publication is verifiable and of .
ScienceDirect is the world's leading source for scientific, technical, and medical research. Explore journals, books and articles. The Business of Academic Publishing: A Strategic Analysis of the Academic Journal Publishing Industry and its Impact on the Future of Scholarly Publishing.